Getting to the Point. Index Sets and Parallelism-Preserving Autodiff for Pointful Array Programming · HackerPapers discussions

Getting to the Point. Index Sets and Parallelism-Preserving Autodiff for Pointful Array Programming — mentioned by bradrn

Sat, 02 May 2026 21:01:42 GMT

> Part of me feels like direct numeric array indexing is one of the last holdouts of a low-level operation screaming for some standardized higher-level abstraction. This paragraph reminds me a bit of Dex: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.05372

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Getting to the Point. Index Sets and Parallelism-Preserving Autodiff for Pointful Array Programming — HN submission

Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:11:12 GMT

Index Sets and Parallelism-Preserving Autodiff for Pointful Array Programming

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Getting to the Point. Index Sets and Parallelism-Preserving Autodiff for Pointful Array Programming — HN submission

Wed, 14 Apr 2021 16:47:30 GMT

The Dex array programming language

3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Getting to the Point. Index Sets and Parallelism-Preserving Autodiff for Pointful Array Programming — HN submission

Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:57:25 GMT

Index Sets and Parallelism-Preserving Autodiff for Pointful Array Programming

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.