<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Efficient Replication via Timestamp Stability (Extended Version) · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.01142/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.01142/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Efficient Replication via Timestamp Stability (Extended Version) — mentioned by _benedict</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29107395</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2104.01142:29107395</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:11:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the trade-offs inherent to EPaxos are resolved by Accord[1], the protocol being developed by the Apache Cassandra community (myself included). There&amp;#x27;s also Tempo[2] and Caesar[3], amongst others, but they retain some of the trade-offs (and introduce their own). All of these protocols are also capable of supporting multi-shard operations, making them a significant advance over MultiPaxos and Raft. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/188... [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.01142 [3] https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03319&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.01142/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
