HackerPapers

arXiv:2104.00687quant-ph

Classically-Verifiable Quantum Advantage from a Computational Bell Test

Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, Soonwon Choi, Umesh V. Vazirani, Norman Y. Yao

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We propose and analyze a novel interactive protocol for demonstrating quantum computational advantage, which is efficiently classically verifiable. Our protocol relies upon the cryptographic hardness of trapdoor claw-free functions (TCFs). Through a surprising connection to Bell's inequality, our protocol avoids the need for an adaptive hardcore bit, with essentially no increase in the quantum circuit complexity and no extra cryptographic assumptions. Crucially, this expands the set of compatible TCFs, and we propose two new constructions: one based upon the decisional Diffie-Hellman problem and the other based upon Rabin's function, $x^2 \bmod N$. We also describe two independent innovations which improve the efficiency of our protocol's implementation: (i) a scheme to discard so-called "garbage bits", thereby removing the need for reversibility in the quantum circuits, and (ii) a natural way of performing post-selection which significantly reduces the fidelity needed to demonstrate quantum advantage. These two constructions may also be of independent interest, as they may be applicable to other TCF-based quantum cryptography such as certifiable random number generation. Finally, we design several efficient circuits for $x^2 \bmod N$ and describe a blueprint for their implementation on a Rydberg-atom-based quantum computer.

arXiv comments
12 pages, 4 figures, 1 table (main text); 12 pages, 1 table (methods + supplementary information). v2: improved notation and clarity, and fixed small errors/typos; no changes to results
Journal reference
Nat. Phys. 18, 918-924 (2022)
DOI
doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01643-7
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics cs.CRCryptography and Security

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2024 to Dec 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. The Google Willow Thing 1 comment
    • I would add one more to this, which I would argue is the main reason: (0) For a quantum algorithm/simulation to be classically verifiable, it needs additional structure; something that leads to a structured, verifiable output despite the intermediate steps being intractable to…

      qnleighView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.