<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Do the Rich Get Richer? Fairness Analysis for Blockchain Incentives · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.14713/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.14713/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Do the Rich Get Richer? Fairness Analysis for Blockchain Incentives — mentioned by thesz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28644134</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.14713:28644134</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 15:56:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Proof of stake leads to &amp;quot;rich gets richer&amp;quot; situation [1]. Proof of work is much more fair, it appears. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.14713.pdf This particular paper shows that every proof-of-stake variant is fallible into the &amp;quot;rich get richer&amp;quot;. That means these PoS schemes do look like shitcoins, not the other way around. Given that and given that I do not like Biticoin in any of its capacities (PoW is not even the most wrong thing with btc), I would like to advise everyone to hate all cryptocurrencies equally strong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.14713/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
