<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.11769/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.11769/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26559831</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2103.11769:26559831</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:12:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;LHC experiment finds possible evidence for new physics&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.11769/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item><item><title>Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays — mentioned by dalewe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26554171</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.11769:26554171</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:21:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper mentions leptoquarks (particles that interact with leptons and quarks with potentially different coupling strengths for different leptons therefore breaking lepton universality) or some unknown heavy (didn&amp;#x27;t look into it any further but I guess the heavy requirement is there because otherwise we would already have observed its effects, I don&amp;#x27;t think it&amp;#x27;s necessary for this particular observation) neutral boson that would for example allow flavor changing of leptons (&amp;quot;flavor&amp;quot; means whether it is an electron, muon our tau lepton). Edit: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.11769.pdf…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.11769/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item><item><title>Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays — mentioned by nabla9</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26553119</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.11769:26553119</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:07:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;CERN: https://home.cern/news/news/physics/intriguing-new-result-lh... Video News release : : https://videos.cern.ch/record/2758757 LHCb article : https://lhcb-public.web.cern.ch/Welcome.html#RK2021 LHCb paper : https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11769&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.11769/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item><item><title>Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays — mentioned by nabla9</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26553112</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.11769:26553112</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:06:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;CERN: https://home.cern/news/news/physics/intriguing-new-result-lh... LHCb article : https://lhcb-public.web.cern.ch/Welcome.html#RK2021 VNR : https://videos.cern.ch/record/2758757 LHCb paper : https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11769&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.11769/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item><item><title>Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays — mentioned by isaacg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26552897</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.11769:26552897</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:39:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe this is the relevant arxiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11769 And here is a post by some of the main authors describing their findings: https://theconversation.com/evidence-of-brand-new-physics-at...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.11769/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item><item><title>Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays — mentioned by isaacg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26552863</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.11769:26552863</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:34:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The official name of the LHCb experiment is the &amp;quot;Large Hadron Collider beauty&amp;quot; experiment, as named by the scientists themselves. So &amp;quot;beauty quark&amp;quot; is more correct in this context. https://home.cern/science/experiments/lhcb Moreover, the paper that describes the result that this article is discussing has &amp;quot;beauty quark&amp;quot; in the name: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11769&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.11769/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item></channel></rss>
