<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Anti-Counterfeiting for Polymer Banknotes Based on Polymer Substrate Fingerprinting · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.06184/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.06184/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Anti-Counterfeiting for Polymer Banknotes Based on Polymer Substrate Fingerprinting — mentioned by readflaggedcomm</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26573840</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.06184:26573840</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:29:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, they left out that part. The paper&amp;#x27;s abstract ends with: &amp;gt;[Our method] ensures that even in the extreme case when counterfeiters have procured the same printing equipment and ink as used by a legitimate government, counterfeiting banknotes remains infeasible because of the difficulty to replicate a stochastic manufacturing process. Which means each note manufacturer has its own signature, though whether the researchers confirmed that with more than random samples from circulation, I haven&amp;#x27;t been able to tell. The full paper is here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.06184&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.06184/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
