<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.02109/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.02109/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip — mentioned by tobmlt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26393855</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.02109:26393855</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:54:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The link is for the paper related to Chris Lee&amp;#x27;s write up in arstechnica today: https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/03/programmable-optical... To make it easier for people, in the article Chris Lee cites this paper by Xanadu researchers: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03202-1 arxiv version: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.02109.pdf, which is what I&amp;#x27;ve put in the url of this post. Chris summarizes his thoughts as: &amp;quot;...this is a big step. There are no large barriers to scaling this same computer to a bigger number of qubits. The researchers will have to reduce photon losses in their…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.02109/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26393854</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2103.02109:26393854</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:54:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Excitement about photonic quantum computing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.02109/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip — mentioned by tobmlt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26393684</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.02109:26393684</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:33:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I was going to submit exactly this but you beat me to it. ;) To make it easier for people, in the article Chris Lee cites this paper by Xanadu researchers: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03202-1 arxiv version: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.02109.pdf Chris summarizes his thoughts as: &amp;quot;...this is a big step. There are no large barriers to scaling this same computer to a bigger number of qubits. The researchers will have to reduce photon losses in their waveguides, and they will have to reduce the amount of leakage from the laser that drives everything (currently it leaks some light…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.02109/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
