<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.01183/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.01183/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions — mentioned by mr_mitm</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39678184</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.01183:39678184</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:14:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Dark energy is a constant in the standard model (equivalent to the cosmological constant) and all observations I&amp;#x27;m aware of besides the Hubble tension are consistent with it being constant. But nothing stops you from going beyond the standard model, and people have done that and proposed models with a dynamic dark energy density, for example quintessence models. They&amp;#x27;d solve some theoretical issues with the standard model, but so far no observations have been precise enough to differentiate between those models and the standard model. Having a dynamic dark energy is a proposed solution to the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.01183/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
