HackerPapers

arXiv:2102.09660eess.AS

Generative Speech Coding with Predictive Variance Regularization

W. Bastiaan Kleijn, Andrew Storus, Michael Chinen, Tom Denton, Felicia S. C. Lim, Alejandro Luebs, Jan Skoglund, Hengchin Yeh

Abstract

The recent emergence of machine-learning based generative models for speech suggests a significant reduction in bit rate for speech codecs is possible. However, the performance of generative models deteriorates significantly with the distortions present in real-world input signals. We argue that this deterioration is due to the sensitivity of the maximum likelihood criterion to outliers and the ineffectiveness of modeling a sum of independent signals with a single autoregressive model. We introduce predictive-variance regularization to reduce the sensitivity to outliers, resulting in a significant increase in performance. We show that noise reduction to remove unwanted signals can significantly increase performance. We provide extensive subjective performance evaluations that show that our system based on generative modeling provides state-of-the-art coding performance at 3 kb/s for real-world speech signals at reasonable computational complexity.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
eess.ASAudio and Speech Processing cs.SDSound

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 2 threads, from Mar 2021 to Aug 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • The author, Fabrice Bellard, is well-known for his work on QEMU (among other things), but I'd treat the rest of the posts as "idea sharing" at an early stage. For example, while BPG (Better Portable Graphics) didn't take off, the core idea (image formats based on video codecs)…

      cbhlView on HNParent context

    • Definitely a real effect, but it seems like Google accounted for that in their listening tests. The Google blog post links to the Lyra paper[1], and Section 5.2 of the paper says: > To evaluate the absolute quality of the different systems on different SNRs a Mean Opinion Score…

      adrianmonkView on HNParent context

    • Worth noting that the paper itself explicitly says 90ms algorithmic delay. Seems plausible to me that there might be additional processing required on top of that, and then you have to add network transit time... suffice it to say that the vast majority of use cases are going to…

      bscphilView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.