<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep Gait Recognition: A Survey · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2102.09546/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2102.09546/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deep Gait Recognition: A Survey — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36621635</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2102.09546:36621635</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 19:38:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the problem is that the environment has changed and people are applying those changes post hoc to the previous environment and when laws were written. Things have changed a lot and I think we need to act accordingly. Continuing as if it all is the same is like boiling a frog, and it is surprising how fast you can turn up the heat. It may seem drastic, but I have seriously considered messaging dang to nuke this account. Not just delete it, but purge all text as well. A strong divorce from the standards, but that is because [deleted] used to be reasonably sufficient to hide one&amp;#x27;s…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2102.09546/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
