<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dynamic Precision Analog Computing for Neural Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2102.06365/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2102.06365/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Dynamic Precision Analog Computing for Neural Networks — mentioned by mindcrime</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41753407</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2102.06365:41753407</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2024 22:33:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Well... analog computing is already a thing. In fact, broadly speaking we can say that analog computing predates digital computing. At least in terms of gaining widespread popularity. And people have absolutely experimented with / researched doing AI on analog computers.[1][2][3][4] Not necessarily LLM&amp;#x27;s mind you, but I don&amp;#x27;t see any reason to think that this conversation pertains exclusively to those. And even if we&amp;#x27;re talking about things that don&amp;#x27;t exist yet (let&amp;#x27;s just say &amp;quot;quantum computers&amp;quot; since they&amp;#x27;re still sort of experimental).. if one is making a universal claim[5] like &amp;quot;AGI is…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2102.06365/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
