<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>$\scriptstyle{BASALT}$: A Rock-Solid Foundation for Epidemic Consensus Algorithms in Very Large, Very Open Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2102.04063/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2102.04063/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>$\scriptstyle{BASALT}$: A Rock-Solid Foundation for Epidemic Consensus Algorithms in Very Large, Very Open Networks — mentioned by lxpz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27610688</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2102.04063:27610688</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 21:32:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, thanks for sharing your perspective. I&amp;#x27;m sorry you interpreted my comment in that way, I did not mean to say that TeXmacs had shortcomings in the way it imports LaTeX, in fact I do believe it does its best given the constraints it faces, but as you justly said the task is impossible in the general case given LaTeX&amp;#x27;s Turing completeness. To be clear the problem is not TeXmacs, but the fact that in a team most people work in LaTeX and having to constantly convert from one another would be impractical. In particular I rely heavily on git to manage document history and to view diffs from my…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2102.04063/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
