HackerPapers

arXiv:2102.03406cs.AI

Symbolic Behaviour in Artificial Intelligence

Adam Santoro, Andrew Lampinen, Kory Mathewson, Timothy Lillicrap, David Raposo

Abstract

The ability to use symbols is the pinnacle of human intelligence, but has yet to be fully replicated in machines. Here we argue that the path towards symbolically fluent artificial intelligence (AI) begins with a reinterpretation of what symbols are, how they come to exist, and how a system behaves when it uses them. We begin by offering an interpretation of symbols as entities whose meaning is established by convention. But crucially, something is a symbol only for those who demonstrably and actively participate in this convention. We then outline how this interpretation thematically unifies the behavioural traits humans exhibit when they use symbols. This motivates our proposal that the field place a greater emphasis on symbolic behaviour rather than particular computational mechanisms inspired by more restrictive interpretations of symbols. Finally, we suggest that AI research explore social and cultural engagement as a tool to develop the cognitive machinery necessary for symbolic behaviour to emerge. This approach will allow for AI to interpret something as symbolic on its own rather than simply manipulate things that are only symbols to human onlookers, and thus will ultimately lead to AI with more human-like symbolic fluency.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Feb 2021 to Jun 2021. Found in 1 HN submission from Feb 2021 to Feb 2021. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • Many of DeepMind's opinion style papers are like this. Another example of the "handwavy" DeepMind paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.03406.pdf It's also worth it to note as well that this isn't a homogenous organization, many DeepMind employees have different opinions on issues…

      JamilDView on HNParent context

    • This article is correct about underspecification, but completely dodges the argument on language and understanding, drawing the hackneyed, shallow distinction between "pattern matching" and "understanding". How do you define understand? People just use the word "understand" to…

      ppodView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.