<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Energy Non-Conservation in Quantum Mechanics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.11052/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.11052/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Energy Non-Conservation in Quantum Mechanics — mentioned by lanstin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40640720</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.11052:40640720</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:57:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11052 claims to have derived an experimentally verifiable prediction from many worlds (namely that energy is only conserved in the linear progression of the wave function, and not necessarily in the &amp;quot;branched&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;collapsed&amp;quot; bit that we observe; and so in certain circumstances it might be possible to observe an interaction that fails to conserve energy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.11052/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
