<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Quantum Field Theory on Which the Everyday World Supervenes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.07884/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.07884/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Quantum Field Theory on Which the Everyday World Supervenes — mentioned by slowmovintarget</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40711390</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.07884:40711390</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:42:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I reject panpsychism on the grounds of the Standard Model. There are no possible fields at the energy levels we&amp;#x27;ve explored that could have an effect such as panpsychism claims (and fields at any other energy levels couldn&amp;#x27;t have such an effect). Sean Carroll published a paper on this, and it&amp;#x27;s worth a read, as is his draft response to Phillip Goff. [1], [2] [1] The Quantum Field Theory on Which the Everyday World Supervenes: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07884 [2] Consciousness and the Laws of Physics: https://philarchive.org/archive/CARCAT-33&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.07884/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.hist-ph</category></item><item><title>The Quantum Field Theory on Which the Everyday World Supervenes — mentioned by canjobear</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28657366</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.07884:28657366</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2021 00:34:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We do have a theory of physics which is likely to be able to cover all the phenomena of biology[1], but that is beside the point. If you think that human behavior cannot be reduced to equations, then you think it cannot be predicted mathematically. I can only interpret this as a claim that there is something about human behavior which is supernatural. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07884&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.07884/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.hist-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
