<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Training · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.06840/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.06840/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Training — mentioned by sighingnow</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37831331</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.06840:37831331</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:43:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The pipedream-2bw paper[1] and the zero-offload paper[2] both show that 1-step delayed asynchronous gradient update doesn&amp;#x27;t affect the convergence (and perplexity) while improve the training efficiency (by fully utilize the bubbles in pipeline parallelism) at a large margin. However, both the Megatron-LM[3] and the DeepSpeed[4] don&amp;#x27;t use pipedream-2bw scheduling. Could anyone share me some insights or ideas about why such an efficient scheduling scheme doesn&amp;#x27;t get popular in the LLM pretraining community? Does it suffer convergence/accuracy issue in practice? Or are there any other concerns…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.06840/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Training — mentioned by treprinum</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36141280</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.06840:36141280</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 17:48:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#x27;s been done already. See DeepSpeed ZeRO NVMe offload: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06840&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.06840/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Training — mentioned by BadInformatics</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26451750</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.06840:26451750</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 01:02:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Having followed this DeepSpeed stuff for a little while, the ZeRO paper is probably as close as you can get to an ELI5 because there&amp;#x27;s no singular brilliant idea behind this. Most of the ideas have been explored already (see e.g. the PyTorch DDP paper), but ZeRO takes them to their logical conclusion by throwing a TON of engineering work into the equation. For example, they implement custom fused kernels on CPU/GPU and a hand-vectorized Adam implementation. I found that this earlier blog post [2] has a much better deep dive (with decent animations and more) into the underlying architecture.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.06840/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Training — mentioned by p1esk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26450942</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.06840:26450942</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:56:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;They did all that before: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06840, but they could only fit a model with 13B weights on a single V100.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.06840/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Training — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26015868</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2101.06840:26015868</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 17:06:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Zero-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Training&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.06840/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
