<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>From Genotype to Phenotype: polygenic prediction of complex human traits · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.05870/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.05870/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>From Genotype to Phenotype: polygenic prediction of complex human traits — mentioned by s1artibartfast</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32387240</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.05870:32387240</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 16:03:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; show me someone who can take a genome and predict adult height within a centimeter, then I’ll believe they have a snowball’s chance of predicting something as nuanced and varied as “attractiveness” or “intelligence”. This has been done. Not to 1cm but ~3cm, and it has been reproduced by many labs all over the world That said, most genetic prediction aren&amp;#x27;t targeting exact vales, but avoiding the worst outcomes, which is a lot easier. Instead of saying this embryo will go grow to X cm, the claim is this embryo is 90% likely to grow to be taller than average. Same for IQ. They don&amp;#x27;t predict…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.05870/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-bio.GN</category></item></channel></rss>
