<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Brightness of VisorSat-Design Starlink Satellites · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.00374/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.00374/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Brightness of VisorSat-Design Starlink Satellites — mentioned by Tepix</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25871222</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.00374:25871222</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:47:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;If you looked at the night sky in the last 10 years you already saw satellites and second stage rockets in orbit many times during the night, even in a light polluted area. Here&amp;#x27;s a study https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00374 that looks at Starlink satellites with the visor. Looks like Starlink will be visible only in rather dark areas with good viewing conditions. It&amp;#x27;s not like you&amp;#x27;re just looking up and they will bother you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.00374/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item></channel></rss>
