<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The One-Way Speed of Light and the Milne Universe · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2012.12037/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2012.12037/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The One-Way Speed of Light and the Milne Universe — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44255610</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2012.12037:44255610</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:23:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Physicists (and in particular the subset doing physical cosmology) don&amp;#x27;t usually explore parametrizations of c because they&amp;#x27;re not clearly physical (and sometimes even clearly unphysical), or alternatively don&amp;#x27;t help solve astrophysical or cosmological problems. Relativists sometimes like to explore things that make using the Tangherlini transformations rather than the Lorentz transformations look positively benign. (To be clear, the Tangherlini synchronization system is clearly unphysical, requiring infinite speeds. His thesis also proposed using a distinguished global frame, which is not…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2012.12037/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>The One-Way Speed of Light and the Milne Universe — mentioned by Kranar</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39096867</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2012.12037:39096867</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:07:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You make an excellent point but as it turns out the CMB would still appear uniform even the speed of light was not the same in all directions. The reason is that if the speed of light is different in one direction, then the effect of time dilation will also be different depending on direction as well and these two factors cancel one another out resulting in what will still appear as a uniform CMB. The below paper goes into complete technical details giving an example of the speed of light being c / 2 in one direction and instantaneous in another direction (so that it averages out to c), and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2012.12037/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>The One-Way Speed of Light and the Milne Universe — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25726051</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2012.12037:25726051</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:02:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The One-Way Speed of Light and the Milne Universe&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2012.12037/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
