<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Beyond Privacy Trade-offs with Structured Transparency · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2012.08347/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2012.08347/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Beyond Privacy Trade-offs with Structured Transparency — mentioned by williamtrask</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40265748</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2012.08347:40265748</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2024 15:50:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You seem to be focusing a lot on remembering or forgetting consequences. Yes, ensuring models know enough about the world to only cause the consequences they desire is a good way for models to not create random harm. This is probably a good thing. However, there are many other reasons why you might want a neural network to provably forget something. The main reason has to do with structuring an AGI&amp;#x27;s power. Even though the simple-story of AGI is something like &amp;quot;make it super powerful, general, and value aligned and humanity will prosper&amp;quot;. However, the reality is more nuanced. Sometimes you…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2012.08347/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Beyond Privacy Trade-offs with Structured Transparency — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40003817</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2012.08347:40003817</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:14:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Structured Transparency: a framework for addressing use/mis-use trade-offs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2012.08347/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
