<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks under High and Low Frequency Information · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2011.06496/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2011.06496/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks under High and Low Frequency Information — mentioned by Imnimo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31414818</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2011.06496:31414818</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 18:44:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The fact that the model seems to be able to make highly accurate predictions even on the images in Figure 2 (including HPF 50 and LPF 10) makes me skeptical. It feels much more probable that this is a sign of data leakage than that the underlying true signal is so strong that it persists even under these transformations. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.06496.pdf Compare the performance under high pass and low pass filters in this paper on CIFAR-10. Is it really the case that differentiating cats from airplanes is so much more fragile than predicting race from chest x-rays?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2011.06496/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
