<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Learning Neural Event Functions for Ordinary Differential Equations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2011.03902/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2011.03902/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Learning Neural Event Functions for Ordinary Differential Equations — mentioned by orbifold</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28957705</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2011.03902:28957705</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:32:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha, yeah I knew that analysis of how to do second order adjoints fast :), in what is basically documentation no less. I figured someone would probably do a ML paper on that eventually. I have had a hard time judging, what is non-trivial in the past, aswell. The next thing that they will probably discover is Jet spaces and Hopf algebras. I&amp;#x27;m also slightly salty because a recent paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.03902.pdf) claimed &amp;quot;Differentiable event handling generalizes many numerical methods that often have specialized methods for gradient computation,...&amp;quot;, citing one of our results. We…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2011.03902/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
