<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>3D Near-Field Millimeter-Wave Synthetic Aperture Radar Imaging · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2011.00636/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2011.00636/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>3D Near-Field Millimeter-Wave Synthetic Aperture Radar Imaging — mentioned by marbu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30176841</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2011.00636:30176841</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 12:55:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This statement about privacy of mmWave radar you raised made me wonder if someone haven&amp;#x27;t already tried to implement SAR[1] with mmWave radar, and quick search reveals that indeed, this is being looked into, eg.: - https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=9136646 - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.00636.pdf That said, it doesn&amp;#x27;t mean that every mmWave radar could work as SAR. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic-aperture_radar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2011.00636/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.SP</category></item></channel></rss>
