HackerPapers

arXiv:2010.16345cs.LO

Towards making formal methods normal: meeting developers where they are

Alastair Reid, Luke Church, Shaked Flur, Sarah de Haas, Maritza Johnson, Ben Laurie

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Formal verification of software is a bit of a niche activity: it is only applied to the most safety-critical or security-critical software and it is typically only performed by specialized verification engineers. This paper considers whether it would be possible to increase adoption of formal methods by integrating formal methods with developers' existing practices and workflows. We do not believe that widespread adoption will follow from making the prevailing formal methods argument that correctness is more important than engineering teams realize. Instead, our focus is on what we would need to do to enable programmers to make effective use of formal verification tools and techniques. We do this by considering how we might make verification tooling that both serves developers' needs and fits into their existing development lifecycle. We propose a target of two orders of magnitude increase in adoption within a decade driven by ensuring a positive `weekly cost-benefit' ratio for developer time invested.

arXiv comments
To be presented at HATRA 2020: Human Aspects of Types and Reasoning Assistants, 15-20 November, 2020, Chicago, IL. 10 pages
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LOLogic in Computer Science cs.SESoftware Engineering

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Nov 2020 to Nov 2020. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.