<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pushing the Limits of Semi-Supervised Learning for Automatic Speech Recognition · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10504/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10504/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Pushing the Limits of Semi-Supervised Learning for Automatic Speech Recognition — mentioned by criticaltinker</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28217528</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.10504:28217528</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 03:41:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;First, congratulations to you and the other authors - this is a very informative and accessible paper with impressive results. &amp;gt; On both datasets, we find that synthesis performance scales log-linearly with model size This &amp;quot;scaling law&amp;quot; observation is starting to become a major trend in NLP [1] and other other modalities such as speech recognition [2] and protein structure/function prediction [3]. Do you have any insight or commentary to offer regarding the next step in improving program synthesis? For example, will techniques to scale up model size continue to be a primary focus (eg as in…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10504/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.AS</category></item><item><title>Pushing the Limits of Semi-Supervised Learning for Automatic Speech Recognition — mentioned by lunixbochs</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27722546</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.10504:27722546</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 16:03:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;One addendum to the linked post&amp;#x27;s notes: &amp;gt; SoTa in low-resource setting Libri-light by a lot on WER clean test 100h labeled: others ~4 vs theirs ~2.5 &amp;gt; SoTa on high-resource noisy data (3.3 vs 3.4) close to SoTa on clean data This note isn&amp;#x27;t super specific, but it&amp;#x27;s outdated if I&amp;#x27;m understanding it correctly. To my understanding, the SOTA on this data is held by Conformer 1B (a 1 billion parameter model), at 1.4 clean, 2.6 noisy. Conformer 1B is something like wav2vec 2.0 pretraining + conformer + noisy student + specaugment. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.10504.pdf -- Wav2vec 2.0 is very cool…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10504/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.AS</category></item></channel></rss>
