https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10345/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39918635urn:hackerpapers:submission:2010.10345:39918635Wed, 03 Apr 2024 15:20:59 GMT<p>The Unpublished Feynman Diagram IIc (Why QED Is Wrong)</p><p></p><p>2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10345/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>physics.hist-phhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34937962urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.10345:34937962Sat, 25 Feb 2023 16:40:05 GMT<p>this is what I&#x27;ve found to be most troubling around this whole debacle: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.10345 how can it be in any way &#x27;scientific&#x27; to base results on unpublished material?? &gt; The analytic results we accept as true are partially unpublished, and the people who did the original calculation are long dead. this ain&#x27;t science, it&#x27;s (American) imperialism applied through the cultural-institution of academia.</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10345/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>physics.hist-ph