<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How Did That Get In My Phone? Unwanted App Distribution on Android Devices · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10088/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10088/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How Did That Get In My Phone? Unwanted App Distribution on Android Devices — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49981935</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2010.10088:49981935</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 18:04:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;How Did That Get in My Phone? Unwanted App Distribution on Android Devices(2020)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10088/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>How Did That Get In My Phone? Unwanted App Distribution on Android Devices — mentioned by SamuelAdams</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28406795</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.10088:28406795</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:10:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes but there are other tradeoffs that are introduced. Carrier-specific ROMs, difficulty upgrading to new android versions, generally more malware found in the Play store [1] and non-privacy-centric defaults [2] aren&amp;#x27;t really great to see either. I&amp;#x27;m not looking to start another android vs iOS debate here. There&amp;#x27;s plenty of that online that I and others can reference. I&amp;#x27;m more interested in seeing how people are finding alternatives or what privacy tradeoffs they are willing to accept to avoid Apple&amp;#x27;s recent photo scanning move. [1]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.10088.pdf (PDF WARNING) [2]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.10088/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
