<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Observing the suppression of superconductivity in RbEuFe$_4$As$_4$ by correlated magnetic fluctuations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.09901/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.09901/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Observing the suppression of superconductivity in RbEuFe$_4$As$_4$ by correlated magnetic fluctuations — mentioned by patrakov</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27392240</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.09901:27392240</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 10:23:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Superconductivity is not really a &amp;quot;yes or no&amp;quot; property. It can be destroyed by a too-strong external magnetic field, or, equivalently, a too-strong current. The quantitative side of this thing (i.e. what allows us to say &amp;quot;superconductivity is weakened&amp;quot;) is &amp;quot;how strong is too-strong&amp;quot;. We can also talk about the &amp;quot;order parameter&amp;quot;, which is related to the fraction of conductivity electrons participating in Cooper pairs, and to the depth (usually ~100 nm) to which the external magnetic field does penetrate the superconductor. The arXiv link to the original research is…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.09901/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.supr-con</category></item></channel></rss>
