<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Deep Bootstrap Framework: Good Online Learners are Good Offline Generalizers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.08127/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.08127/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Deep Bootstrap Framework: Good Online Learners are Good Offline Generalizers — mentioned by preetum</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26530769</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.08127:26530769</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2021 14:37:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We have ImageNet experiments in Section 4 of the full paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08127&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.08127/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>The Deep Bootstrap Framework: Good Online Learners are Good Offline Generalizers — mentioned by preetum</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26530756</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.08127:26530756</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2021 14:36:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the exact comparison we make in the paper. We have subsampled ImageNet experiments as well; see Figure 3 in the full paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08127&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.08127/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>The Deep Bootstrap Framework: Good Online Learners are Good Offline Generalizers — mentioned by preetum</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26530747</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.08127:26530747</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2021 14:34:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Note that we also have ImageNet experiments, with entirely real data (non-synthetic). See Section 4, and in particular Figure 3 of the full paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08127 To clarify some other comments on this post: In all settings, we compare &amp;quot;Real World&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Ideal World&amp;quot; for the same underlying distribution. Eg, we never compare CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-5m, we only compare &amp;quot;Real World CIFAR-5m&amp;quot; vs &amp;quot;Ideal World CIFAR-5m&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.08127/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
