<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fast Stencil-Code Computation on a Wafer-Scale Processor · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.03660/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.03660/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Fast Stencil-Code Computation on a Wafer-Scale Processor — mentioned by tyingq</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27461264</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.03660:27461264</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:36:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s better info here: https://blog.inten.to/hardware-for-deep-learning-part-4-asic... &amp;quot;The instruction set supports operations on INT16, FP16, and FP32 types. Floating-point adds, multiplies, and fused multiply-accumulate (or FMAC, with no rounding of the product prior to the add) can occur in a 4-way SIMD manner for 16-bit operands. The instruction set supports SIMD operations across subtensors of four-dimensional tensors, making use of tensor address generation hardware to efficiently access tensor data in memory.&amp;quot; The source appears to be this PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.03660.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.03660/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>Fast Stencil-Code Computation on a Wafer-Scale Processor — mentioned by rrss</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25150729</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.03660:25150729</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:55:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The corresponding paper is very interesting: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.03660.pdf Particularly the SpMV CS-1 code listing on page 5, and this comment (in section VI.B) about accuracy: &amp;gt; The measured normwise relative residuals with mixed and 32-bit are shown in Figure 9. Up to iteration 7 the mixed precision implementation tracks the 32-bit, but then fails to reduce the residual further. With this precision, machine precision is about 10^−3. We have observed this accuracy for very well conditioned systems. Here, the growth of rounding errors during the iterative solve explains the loss of an…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.03660/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>Fast Stencil-Code Computation on a Wafer-Scale Processor — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24748998</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2010.03660:24748998</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2020 20:51:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Fast Stencil-Code Computation on a Wafer-Scale Processor&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.03660/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
