<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Toy Model for Local and Deterministic Wave-function Collapse · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.01327/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.01327/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Toy Model for Local and Deterministic Wave-function Collapse — mentioned by naasking</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33224172</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.01327:33224172</guid><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2022 15:11:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course there are: * Hossenfelder&amp;#x27;s own toy model, https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01327v5 * Gerard &amp;#x27;t Hooft&amp;#x27;s cellular automata model: https://webspace.science.uu.nl/~hooft101/gthpub/FFP11_2010.p... * https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/714819 Models that violate Bell&amp;#x27;s theorem are in fact simple to construct. Everyone agrees that superdeterminism can evade Bell&amp;#x27;s theorem, the key is making this evasion as plausible or more plausible than accepting many worlds or the absence of counterfactual definiteness. Given so little effort has been expended in this direction because of incorrect…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.01327/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>A Toy Model for Local and Deterministic Wave-function Collapse — mentioned by naasking</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30118068</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.01327:30118068</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:55:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Bell&amp;#x27;s theorem assumes statistical independence in its proof that local hidden variables can&amp;#x27;t reproduce QM. Superdeterminism violates statistical independence, therefore Bell&amp;#x27;s theorem does not rule out a superdeterministic local hidden variables theory, like this one: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01327v5&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.01327/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
