Pretty Good Phone Privacy — mentioned by apienx

Tue, 06 Sep 2022 14:21:43 GMT

Damning conclusions in TFP. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.09035.pdf "In addition, law enforcement has long demanded backdoor access to private user devices and user data [61]. We do not believe that users of PGPP, in its current form, would be capable of withstanding targeted legal or extra-legal attacks by nation-state organizations (e.g., the FBI or NSA)" Randomizing the IMSI is great and all, but it only protects against >20-year old interception techniques (e.g. Stingrays). Nothing to see here.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Pretty Good Phone Privacy — HN submission

Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:36:39 GMT

Pretty Good Phone Privacy: end-to-end perspective on the cellular architecture

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Pretty Good Phone Privacy · HackerPapers discussions

Pretty Good Phone Privacy — mentioned by apienx

Pretty Good Phone Privacy — HN submission