<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ebb-and-Flow Protocols: A Resolution of the Availability-Finality Dilemma · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04987/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04987/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Ebb-and-Flow Protocols: A Resolution of the Availability-Finality Dilemma — mentioned by lazzlazzlazz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32020118</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2009.04987:32020118</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 22:02:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been professionally close to the situation for more than four years, and it has never been &amp;quot;two months from the Merge&amp;quot; before. It was expected to be in about four years about five years ago. That&amp;#x27;s the most it&amp;#x27;s been delayed so far, which is impressive in my view given how much novel research has been required. For anyone curious about an academic explanation of the problems being solved by ETH 2.0&amp;#x27;s consensus model, see this paper[1] out of David Tse&amp;#x27;s lab at Stanford. [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04987&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04987/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
