<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Infinitesimal analysis without the Axiom of Choice · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04980/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04980/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Infinitesimal analysis without the Axiom of Choice — mentioned by ZoltanAK2</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38062871</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2009.04980:38062871</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2023 21:13:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You write, &amp;quot;we shouldn&amp;#x27;t need the axiom of choice to define the derivative.&amp;quot; The good news is that we don&amp;#x27;t! Only model-theoretic approaches, which justify the infinitesimal methods by constructing a hyperreal field, require (a weak form of) the axiom of choice [2]. However, there are axioms for nonstandard analysis which are conservative over the usual choice-free set theory ZF. The three axioms of Hrbacek and Katz presented in the article &amp;quot;Infinitesimal analysis without the Axiom of Choice&amp;quot; [1] are the best recent example: these axioms allow you to do everything that is done in Keisler&amp;#x27;s…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04980/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
