<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The NANOGrav 12.5-year Data Set: Search For An Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04496/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04496/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The NANOGrav 12.5-year Data Set: Search For An Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background — mentioned by privong</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24630984</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2009.04496:24630984</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:01:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s alluded to in the Quanta Mag article, but it&amp;#x27;s worth repeating the information from the NANOgrav discovery paper[0], as stated in the paper&amp;#x27;s abstract: However, we find no statistically significant evidence that this process has quadrupolar spatial correlations, which we would consider necessary to claim a GWB detection consistent with General Relativity. So I&amp;#x27;m inclined to think that all the &amp;quot;explanation&amp;quot; papers are premature. It&amp;#x27;s an interesting (low-significance) signal in the data, but more data are needed. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04496&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04496/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.HE</category></item></channel></rss>
