<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>An excess of small-scale gravitational lenses observed in galaxy clusters · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04471/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04471/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>An excess of small-scale gravitational lenses observed in galaxy clusters — mentioned by cozzyd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24456629</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2009.04471:24456629</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2020 22:58:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s the arXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04471 As I understand, they see a discrepancy between simulation and observation of some lensing observables. Could be something wrong with the calculation of the observables, something wrong with the implementation of the simulations, or (the exciting bit) with the physics put into the simulations. As a complete non-expert on lensing observables and cosmological simulations, I&amp;#x27;d guess it&amp;#x27;s one of the first two. As mentioned in the text, there are many other discrepancies between observations and simulations that are still unresolved. This…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2009.04471/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
