<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Replication Study on Measuring the Growth of Open Source · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.07753/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.07753/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Replication Study on Measuring the Growth of Open Source — mentioned by alisonatwork</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44946937</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2008.07753:44946937</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:28:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There is an ASCII chart in https://phrack.org/issues/72/18_md#article which references https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.07753 [PDF], a 2020 article showing that open source peaked in 2013. In some qualitative sense that feels intuitively correct, but I am skeptical that in the modern world filled with a zillion NPM dependencies and the cloud YAML explosion and now vibe-coded everything that we are actually producing less lines of open source than we did in 2013. Is anyone aware of newer studies that investigate this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.07753/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
