<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Jensen polynomials are not a plausible route to proving the Riemann Hypothesis · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.07206/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.07206/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Jensen polynomials are not a plausible route to proving the Riemann Hypothesis — mentioned by nbulka</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49261307</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2008.07206:49261307</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:08:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;IANAM but this might be unexplored territory because Jensen polynomials are no longer considered a &amp;quot;plausible route&amp;quot; to proving the Riemann Hypothesis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07206&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.07206/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
