https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.06537/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26732830urn:hackerpapers:mention:2008.06537:26732830Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:15:19 GMT<p>Argh, this is the paper I meant to link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.06537.pdf (Updated the above comment as well)</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.06537/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.SEhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26732619urn:hackerpapers:mention:2008.06537:26732619Wed, 07 Apr 2021 22:54:54 GMT<p>Basic fuzzers can surprisingly go a long way. Barton Miller (the professor who first coined the term fuzzing), actually wrote a paper last year [0] where he just ran a very basic fuzzer against a bunch of common UNIX tools. Even after all these years of testing/usage, they still managed to find a ton of issues. [0]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.06537.pdf</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.06537/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.SEhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25233210urn:hackerpapers:submission:2008.06537:25233210Fri, 27 Nov 2020 22:42:41 GMT<p>The Relevance of Classic Fuzz Testing: Have We Solved This One?</p><p></p><p>2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.06537/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.SE