<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Decomposition of Feynman Integrals by Multivariate Intersection Numbers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.04823/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.04823/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Decomposition of Feynman Integrals by Multivariate Intersection Numbers — mentioned by T-A</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24242357</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2008.04823:24242357</guid><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2020 07:16:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes. &amp;quot;We discuss a recursive algorithm for the computation of multivariate intersection numbers and provide three different approaches for a direct decomposition of Feynman integrals&amp;quot; [1] pretty much says it all. I&amp;#x27;m surprised to see such a technical subject being covered in a popsci article. It&amp;#x27;s pretty much as far as you can get from the usual fare of big-picture speculation about the interpretation of QM etc. The very last sentence (&amp;quot;it may even foreshadow a new perspective on reality&amp;quot;) almost seems like an afterthought, added at the last moment to appease the audience. [1]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.04823/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
