<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.03703/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.03703/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimation — mentioned by mxwsn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26347604</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2008.03703:26347604</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:13:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Large model capacity enough to perfectly memorize/interpolate data may not be a bad thing. A phenomenon known as &amp;quot;deep double descent&amp;quot; says that increasing modeling capacity relative to the dataset size can reduce generalization error, even after the model achieves perfect training performance (see work by Mikhail Belkin [0] and empirical demonstrations on large deep learning tasks by researchers from Harvard/OpenAI [1]). Other work argues that memorization is critical to good performance on real-world tasks where the data distribution is often long-tailed [2]: to perform well at tasks where…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2008.03703/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
