<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Online Spatio-Temporal Learning in Deep Neural Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.12723/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.12723/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Online Spatio-Temporal Learning in Deep Neural Networks — mentioned by orbifold</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24695993</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2007.12723:24695993</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 09:20:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;They don&amp;#x27;t address the fundamental issue of BPTT in an RNN model. To my mind this is a much larger block to biological plausibility than how to track the error locally. Besides this has been addressed in various forms in earlier work: - Hochreiter and Schmidhuber present a truncated version of BPTT in the original LSTM paper that tracks part of the error locally and forward in time (https://www.bioinf.jku.at/publications/older/2604.pdf) - Bellec et al. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17236-y present a similar algorithm that tracks the error with something they call eligibility…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.12723/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
