<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Neural Sparse Voxel Fields · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.11571/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.11571/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Neural Sparse Voxel Fields — mentioned by duckworthd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24079631</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2007.11571:24079631</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 08:21:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We did not aim to speed this part of NeRF up. Check out Neural Sparse Voxel Fields (https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11571) for some effort in that direction. It&amp;#x27;s 10x faster, but there&amp;#x27;s still another 10x to go till you get video frame rates :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.11571/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
