<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.10722/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.10722/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate — mentioned by shagie</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34896477</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2007.10722:34896477</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2023 14:53:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The &amp;quot;black holes as dark matter&amp;quot; were termed MACHOs (massive astrophysical compact halo object) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massive_compact_halo_object Most of that has been ruled out (see the graph on http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2016/06/black-hole-dark-matt... ) and while some black holes may fall into the dark matter category, the observed &amp;quot;if there were that many black holes, micro lensing would be this common...&amp;quot; The result of those tests constrains black holes to less than 1% of the calculated dark matter... though there are some windows where there is very likely active research…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.10722/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
