arXiv:2007.00810stat.ML
On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representations
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Identifiability is a desirable property of a statistical model: it implies that the true model parameters may be estimated to any desired precision, given sufficient computational resources and data. We study identifiability in the context of representation learning: discovering nonlinear data representations that are optimal with respect to some downstream task. When parameterized as deep neural networks, such representation functions typically lack identifiability in parameter space, because they are overparameterized by design. In this paper, building on recent advances in nonlinear ICA, we aim to rehabilitate identifiability by showing that a large family of discriminative models are in fact identifiable in function space, up to a linear indeterminacy. Many models for representation learning in a wide variety of domains have been identifiable in this sense, including text, images and audio, state-of-the-art at time of publication. We derive sufficient conditions for linear identifiability and provide empirical support for the result on both simulated and real-world data.
Edit: actually this paper is the canonical reference (?): https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00810 models converge to same space up to a linear transformation. Makes sense that a linear transformation (like PCA) would be able to undo that transformation. You can show for example that…
tsurbaView on HNParent context
Many discriminative models converge to same representation space up to a linear transformation. Makes sense that a linear transformation (like PCA) would be able to undo that transformation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00810 Without properly reading the linked article, if thats…
tsurbaView on HNParent context