<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>What is the price of abandoning dark matter? Cosmological constraints on alternative gravity theories · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.00555/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.00555/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>What is the price of abandoning dark matter? Cosmological constraints on alternative gravity theories — mentioned by thicktarget</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44123897</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2007.00555:44123897</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 07:46:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Many state of the art galaxy formation simulations use MHD, it does not however affect the formation of the Cosmic Web. &amp;gt; MOND’s also been around since the early 1980s, but, in 2021, it finally developed a model – the Aether-Scalar-Tensor framework, or AeST – which ALSO maps perfectly onto the acoustic peaks revealed by WMAP and Planck. (It does it by proposing a new vector field and scalar field that duplicate the effects of Cold Dark Matter in the early universe This doesn&amp;#x27;t contradict what I said. These models are not simply removing DM, I said people have tried with modified gravity…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2007.00555/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
