De-anonymization of authors through arXiv submissions during double-blind review — mentioned by aglionby

Thu, 02 Jul 2020 16:48:23 GMT

There's some similar work out that analyses the impact on conference paper acceptance of having deanonymised arXiv versions of papers available before review. They look at ICLR papers for the last 2 years. I've not read it in a lot of detail but it looks like there's a positive correlation between releasing papers and having them accepted. Not sure how they've controlled for confounders (you only release papers you're confident in the quality of on arXiv?) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.00177.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

De-anonymization of authors through arXiv submissions during double-blind review · HackerPapers discussions

De-anonymization of authors through arXiv submissions during double-blind review — mentioned by aglionby