A new relativistic theory for Modified Newtonian Dynamics · HackerPapers discussions

A new relativistic theory for Modified Newtonian Dynamics — mentioned by T-A

Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:56:12 GMT

https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00082

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

A new relativistic theory for Modified Newtonian Dynamics — mentioned by raattgift

Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:15:05 GMT

> There is something fundamental in the universe that we don't understand. Good! I hope there's lots of fundamental things we don't understand well yet. We can then enjoy improving our understanding. "The paper" below is https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00082 == https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.12... which is the topic of the fine article linked at the top. > If this result holds, it could be an amazing leap I'm not sure if one can use the term result here. In the paper there is just a write-down of a theory that is deliberately designed to match an extra couple lines of…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

A new relativistic theory for Modified Newtonian Dynamics — mentioned by raattgift

Tue, 19 Oct 2021 19:11:57 GMT

This is a surprisingly good write-up. The Skordis & Zlosnik paper can be found at https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00082 I'll start with some comments for non-experts, and then escalate about ten paragraphs further down. tl;dr: there are lots of things that hang on General Relativity being correct practically everywhere in our universe, the only "hiding places" that don't break astrophysical objects (or even laboratory experiments, including in robotic laboratories we have sent to other places in our solar system) is very close to the big bang, deep inside black holes, and in large masses brought…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

A new relativistic theory for Modified Newtonian Dynamics — mentioned by BluSyn

Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:49:33 GMT

Linked in the article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00082

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.