<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.14799/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.14799/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey — mentioned by gwern</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23725461</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2006.14799:23725461</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 16:45:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Forer effect material was written by humans, one might note... But there was a paper just the other day on more rigorous evaluation: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14799&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.14799/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23675319</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2006.14799:23675319</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:30:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;46 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.14799/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
