<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Direct Feedback Alignment Scales to Modern Deep Learning Tasks and Architectures · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.12878/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.12878/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Direct Feedback Alignment Scales to Modern Deep Learning Tasks and Architectures — mentioned by KhoomeiK</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25351541</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2006.12878:25351541</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 21:24:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biases [1] trains graph neural nets on astrophysical phenomena and then performs symbolic regression to generate algebraic formulae to elegantly model the phenomena in a classical physics framework. It&amp;#x27;s largely gone under the radar but has pretty interesting implications for NLP and language theory in my opinion. Direct Feedback Alignment Scales to Modern Deep Learning Tasks and Architectures [2] applies DFA, an approach to training neural nets without backprop, to modern architectures like the Transformer. It does surprisingly…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.12878/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
